Chandrasekaran Bala
Asked September 29, 2016

Validity of judgment by Division bench

  • 5 Answers
  • 1241 Views

Hi Sir, A divisional Bench of Supreme court of India made a conclusion for a matter in judgments. In that judgments it also Mention that the “matter should be reconsidered by a larger Bench and for that purpose the records of the case be placed before the Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India for constitution of a larger Bench.” I want to know whether until larger bench final decision, whether the SC divisional bench “REPORATBLE” judgments is valid?. Any point in law highlight above subject? 

Answers 5

Sir,

Yes, the judgment of the Division bench of the Supreme Court is valid. As you might be aware that there exists a hierarchy among the Courts in India. The following lays down the hierarchy in ascending order:

  • Lower Courts
  • High Court
  • Division bench of High Court
  • Supreme Court (from less to more bench strength)
  • However, when a Court of any bench strength gives a judgment, it remains valid until it is overruled by a higher Court or by a higher bench strength of the same Court. Thus, in your case, the judgment of the Division bench of the SC is valid. The Court might have felt that the matter should be considered by a larger bench strength and thus have mentioned it in its judgment. Otherwise, as long as the larger bench does not overrule this judgment, it is valid.

     

    Hope this helps!

    Agree Comment 1 Agree almost 4 years ago

    Default avatar
    Chandrasekaran Bala

    No, it wont be valid as there will be a reference to larger bench which will decide on particular facts of case but wont lay down any law . This is so because there must have been two decision both contradicting each other by two different division bench of Supreme Court. It will be difficult to say which is to be adhered.

    Agree Comment 0 Agrees almost 4 years ago

    Sir,

    If the Division Bench of the Supreme Court has passed the order, then it has to be valid and binding (Art. 141 of the Indian Constitution). However, if the SC has refrained from giving any judgment and has directly referred to a higher bench, then till the point the matter is decided upon by the higher bench, the decision of the lower court will prevail. If it's a judgment, it has to be binding. 

    Agree Comment 1 Agree almost 4 years ago

    To further substantiate the point, if the division bench has ordered to refer the ratio of the case to a higher bench, then of course, there will be no binding judgment as there is no judgment. However, if the Court passes an interim order, that order will be valid till the higher bench decides otherwise, as was seen in the Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain case.

    Agree Comment 0 Agrees almost 4 years ago

    Default avatar
    Chandrasekaran Bala

    Dear Sir,

    Thanks for your reply. kindly advice how could I know whether Interim order is issued for that judgment (Binded?).

    In judgment it was mentioned as "Reportable".

    Kindly advice.

     

     

     

    Agree Comment 0 Agrees almost 4 years ago

    Please Login or Register to Submit Answer

    Directory ads
    Need to talk to a lawyer?

    Book a phone consultation with a top-rated lawyer on Lawfarm.